Self-evaluation can be challenging.
The process becomes incrementally more difficult when the self-analysis involves evaluating attitudes and behaviors as a member of a group, particularly when that group is representing numerous constituents and answers to the public.
Each of the seven elected members of the Jefferson City Board of Education recently took part in a self-evaluation, and their responses were compiled into a survey. Those results were discussed during a Monday meeting facilitated by representatives of the Missouri School Boards Association.
The members generally agreed they avoid micro-management and enjoy a "strong partnership" with their chief administrator, Superintendent Larry Linthacum.
Our observations support that consensus, although the history of those observations is not extensive. A majority of the board members are relatively new - five have been newly elected since 2014 - and, by that yardstick, so is Linthacum, who joined the district in 2015.
What the board may have lost in institutional knowledge, however, is offset by fresh perspectives, which district voters supported.
The survey found board members split on other matters, including openness, outreach and engagement with constituents.
Again, we agree the board has room to improve its connection with district patrons.
The district's climate has changed since 2014, when district patrons publicly vocalized concerns, including undisciplined students, demoralized teachers and a disengaged administration.
Changes in district leadership and responsiveness on issues have created opportunities board members must seize to strengthen two-way communication between district officials and patrons.
The survey also revealed other differences among board members, including whether their opinions are respected by their peers.
Differences among board members are beneficial, not detrimental.
One criticism we have with the board is it sometimes appears too monolithic, rendering a singular outcome with little dissent. Voters elect school board members individually, not as a bloc. Discussion and debate not only are expected, they are healthy components to arriving at the best possible outcome.
Overall, we commend each school board member for an honest self-assessment and a useful survey. We believe this board and administration have a mission to improve education and a strategy to get there.
Obstacles, however, will arise. When they do, listening, learning and adapting must be part of that strategy.